Thursday, 7 January 2016

Of Atheism And Child Abuse

I have recently ran into a bit of a discussion with certain people on Twitter. As you can see if you follow the link it was essentially about freedom of one's children to choose their own religious affiliation - or not as the case may be.

To recap what I understood was being said to me: the fact my parents chose not to take me to church on religious holidays has been taken as their imposing their own religious affiliation, or lack thereof, on me, thus apparently depriving me of some sort of freedom of choice. It is also probably good to mention that the whole discussion started with someone saying they're going to send their child to church for Christmas service so she could recite atheistic and provocative poems of a pop artist.

This has subsequently been hailed with a follow-up by someone regretting said pop artist wasn't around when they were taken to church by their own parents so they can, presumably, disrupt the service and annoy the congregation in the same or similar manner. My comment to both these was that, luckily for me, I wasn't subjected to church visits by my parents and thus had no need for subversive and/or offensive poems or pop artists to quote there.

So far, so good, one might think. Yet, the person too young to be disruptive in the way advocated found it necessary to tell me off as described earlier. Apparently, if I, as an atheist, decide not to take y underage children to church, I am committing an offense against their freedom of choice. I must say I was dumbfounded and didn't seek to continue the discussion further, concluding, probably correctly that the person(s) involved have a somewhat hazy and shaky notion of freedom, atheism, religion, child upbringing and education and so on and so forth.

And yet, I couldn't stop thinking in exactly what ways they were wrong - and harmful to their own children and teir proclaimed atheism. Let's try and deconstruct this a little, for clarity, and see what we end up with...

First thing that strikes me is this: these people have been dragged along to religious services themselves as children and apparently do not see their parents as imposing their views on them. Rather, they, post festum, express joy at the (unconsumated!) opportunity that might have given them to be obnoxious. Worse, the current parent, most likely himself an atheist, happily pack his own daughter to Mass with the express intent and encouragement to disrup it. At best, he fails to stop her from doing so, even if the idea was hers alone. Being an atheist does not - should not - mean one has to behave like an ass, or incite other to it. In case of encouraging and inciting underage children to such acts it borders on child abuse - and probably sits on the wrong side of that border, too.

Second, and with all of the above in mind, said mind boggles at the criticism that an atheist parent is doing something wrong by not sending their children to church. For one, such a parent is not qualified to give advice on such matters - unless it is advice an atheist would give to anyone seeking to learn about religion, namely that it's all fairy tales, smoke, mirrors, and all sorts of other silly - and damaging things. If I, as an atheist, refrained from informing and educating my child in the best way I can muster then - and only then - I would be failing at my duty to them.

While I may very well not forbid them church visits should they express an interest, in what deranged system of thought I am supposed to actively encourage practices which, in my own considered opinion are stupid at best,, and harmful at worst? And finally, what sort of a deranged person I would be to urge my children to go and taunt people who are believers themselves? For one, this is bad manners - to say the least. And then, sending your own child to do your dirty work is not even borderline criminal: it is criminal.

So, in final analysis: @gjesic, you are abusing your own child and @serbianhitman, you should apply your own standards to your own parents who made you go to church against your own free will and better judgement; oh, and you are, if not complicit, then guilty of inciting @gjesic to child abuse.

QED







PS
And me, what about me?

Well, I shall continue to educate my own child to know all available facts about any religion she cares to ask about, but I will also point out that no religion exists that makes the tiniest bit of sense in any way whatsoever. And, I shall redouble my efforts to instill in her the values of good manners, common decency and respect for other peoples opinions, however misguided or silly they may be. If I manage to do these things half as well as my parents managed with me, she will grow up to make up her own mind regardless of whether she was taken to religious services or not.

PPS
As a matter of fact, my child has been exposed to much more churches, religions, religious rites and information - including attending Christmas Mass, than one would expect from a Minister of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Because that is the only way we win...


Tuesday, 10 November 2015

UPDATED: A Storm In A Teacup? (aka #FAIL)

At long last, we seem to have entered the era of affordable yet powerful smartphones. With the commendable efforts of OnePlus, a few other Chinese vendors, and now a home grown one, Wilefox, one can rest assured that they can get their hands on a "flagship killer" for less than half of the flagship smartphone price.

Having tremendously enjoyed the first "flagship killer", aka OnePlus One, and currently finding that OnePlus Two seems to be a worthy successor (as is likely the OnePlus X), it was with great excitement that I learned about the first "designed in UK" (because, natch, everything these days seems to be "made in China") effort, the Wileyfox Storm and Swift.


Of course, the Swift is not exactly a flagship killer. Rather, it is a "bargain basement killer". You are probably way better off getting the Swift than, say Moto G or some such great deal smartphone. However, having got used to a little bit more of a powerhouse, the Swift never really whetted my appetite - especially after I learned about the "killer feature" (or a componenet, if you will) of the Storm: the 20MP Sony EXMOR IMX220 BSI Stacked (60FPS) CMOS Rear Camera.

Now, I don't particularly care for the peta-pixel counts, but this sensor is by views of most people who know that sort of stuff a real gem when it comes to picture quality and especially in low light situations. As these days I tend to take too many photos on my phone - mostly by virtue of it always being handy, but also because it will automagically make photos appear in all the (safe) places I care about this sounded like an opportunity not to be missed.

A little trial was in the offing...

And what could possibly go wrong? Let's review the most basic items on the spec sheet: 4GB RAM - great!, FAST CPU - hooray!, 5.5" screen - nice size, I found the 6" of Nexus 6 a bit too much, off screen Android buttons - a favourite, dual SIM or SIM + MicroSD card - bingo!, and of course, that little gem of a camera.

OK, there is no optical image stabilisation (OIS). But, I can live without that, especially with the camera that has supposedly great low light performance. This alone can compensate for sensor shake by allowing faster shutter speeds. So, nothing to worry about. Let's get going and take some lovely pictures!

We now hop into our time machine and fast forward a few days...

What disappointment! What anti-climax! And let's not even bother with the, possibly serious, issues of the Storm seemingly having trouble with a Three UK SIM card randomly deciding it was not present any more then suddenly changing its mind. And let's not bother ourselves even with scorching heat (almost impossible to hold at times) that emanated from the top rear of the phone whenever the CPU did any serious work.

Oh, no. Instead, let's just focus on that lovely camera:

True, its low light performance is brilliant. True, it is able to create really lovely pictures in pretty much any light conditions. True, even, that lack of OIS is not much of a problem even in low light. But. But! BUT! Auto-focus. Or shall I rephrase: What auto-focus? Because, essentially, for all intents and purposes the thing has none. None at all. None that is in any way useful for anything but taking nice pictures of architecture. Very large and stable architecture. For any other subject auto-focus is so slow that you are pretty much guaranteed NOT to get the photo you intended. And I don't just mean kids jumping up and down. I haven't tried, but I suspect even taking a photo of a drowsy sloth may be a challenge. And this was not just the case with the stock camera app. Oh, no. Google Camera struggled, too, as did a couple of random tries from the Play Store.

Don't believe me? Try it yourself. Ask a mate who got one (it's on open sale in UK).

Does this make the Storm a flop? In my opinion, and for my money - yes. These days we have come to expect our phones - especially "flagships" and "flagship killers" - to be at least competent cameras as well. Storm fails miserably in this respect. Its camera - unless it receives a major software (firmware!) update - is more or less not fit for purpose. If you want decent photos in your life either get a different phone, get a second phone, or carry a small camera with you at all times. Just don't relay on Wileyfox Storm to fit the bill.

Does this make the Storm a useless phone that I am going to get rid of and look for a different second phone? Well, no. It's the MicroSD card slot (and a possibility of dual SIM operation) that clinches the deal for it as a second phone as is its overall spec sheet. But only ever as a second(ary) phone which is destined to take a role of a hard disk based music player I realised I needed and couldn't quite get these days. And, in a pinch, with careful forethought and patient subjects - it will even make a decent camera.

PS

A little note on Dual SIM phones...

Very useful things, Dual SIM phones unless you have a very specific requirement for it, Dual Standby is probably as much as you need in terms of simultaneous operation. However, there is one quite serious downside: you forget/lose/misplace your Dual SIM phone and you're as good as having no phone at all. I would recommend having two phones if you really need to be accessible at all times. Get a Dual SIM phone by all means. Heck, make both your phones Dual SIM. Just never let just one hold both your important SIMs. I find the following works best: the main phone holds main SIM, the other SIM slot is taken by a local/cheap rate SIM that will still help out in areas of random patchy coverage, or when you're abroad. Have your other important SIM in a different phone and use its secondary SIM slot for MicroSD card to store media on. Just never ever put all your important communications eggs into a single basket.

You will lose it one day...

UPDATE:

My new Storm is on its way back to Amazon. Reason? Not what you may have expected. I could actually live with the slow focusing camera. It's actually apparent poor build quality: the backlight under the off-screen navigation keys (Back and Home, if you have to ask) has started to flicker randomly - and annoyingly. Thank goodness for Amazon 30 day no questions asked return policy (not that I didn't tell them the thing's faulty).

OnePlus X, here I come...

Tuesday, 25 August 2015

Repost: Seriously Silly

A very early one, this. But @Pontifex got me thinking about this again today...

Via venerable Rosa, a list of questions from one Eric Hovind...

As Rosa already pointed out, the questions are indeed silly and certainly not something "science can't answer". She even goes as far as providing sensible replies to each and every one of them (even if some are a bit tongue in cheek). What I'll try to do is give questions exactly as much respect as they deserve, which is very little. And I don't think it matters, or that Eric (or his dad, Kent) will really care. After all, they certainly didn't ask them so they can get sensible and correct answers, because if they did their whole world-view would collapse around their ears. So, let's have a bit of fun...
  1. Why am I here?
    Here? What here you have in mind? On Earth? In my office? In general? I'm sorry, but there is no "in general". Unless you mean the birds and the bees. But Rosa already told you about that...
  2. What happens when you die?
    Nothing, really. Unless you meant the funeral, mourning of those who survived you, and suchlike? In which case you're again asking silly questions.
  3. What is the purpose of my life?
    The purpose of your life is to make people believe in falsehoods. The purpose of my life is to enjoy it while it lasts. The purpose of life in general is to replicate the genes. You should read more Dawkins, you know.
  4. What determines “Good” and “Evil”?
    It's the wrong question. It's not "what", but "who". Even you should know that, and even if a god existed. Unless, of course, your god is a rock or something, rather than someone. In any case, it's you and me baby, who determine good and evil. I wonder we share the definitions, though, you and I.
  5. Where did love come from?
    Which love you have in mind, Eric? My love for my wife comes from me. Her love for me comes from her. Your love for your god comes from some sort of delusion, but that's your problem, not mine.
  6. Why does mankind abuse and kill its own?
    Let me answer with a question once again: Why do most animals abuse and kill their own? But if you really want to know, it's for personal gain and enhancing chances of one's (genes') survival. Oh, but if I grant you a god exists then the answer is obvious: because your god wants it like that. Which means he/she/it must be evil (see also question number four).
  7. Where did the first teeny-weeny molecule of matter come from?
    As Rosa kindly explained it came from the first teeny-weeny atoms of matter. Go grab yourself a textbook on physics, will you?
  8. Does a physical world exist beyond my mind?
    Yes it does. It's all that stuff you can feel with your fingers.
  9. Why are there male and female?
    You really should spend more time actually finding answers, rather than just piling up questions. By the way, there are also living things that do not have male and female forms. And now go grab yourself a biology textbook.
  10. Why does it take both sexes to create a new life?
    Not necessarily. See above. And that textbook. You can sure afford one. Oh, and because it's fun. Sex. Seriously. You don't think so?
  11. What is life?
    Have a look in the mirror. Then go to a farm and look at all the animals and plants. Then, if you're still curious ,go get yourself a microscope and have a look into a drop of puddle water. But seriously... No, can't be bothered. And by the way, why is such a question even relevant? Interesting, yes. But relevant? Not sure it is.
  12. Where did laws come from?
    In UK, the laws are enacted by parliament. The parliament is elected in general elections, generally held every four or five years. Elected are 650 (soon to be 600) members of parliament. All of them human (at least by the outside looks). So, I guess the laws come from men (and women). At least in Britain, and I suspect in the States, too. Don't tell me you didn't know that?
  13. How did Time, Space and Matter come into existence?
    Here, you should read more Hawking. Can you really not afford a good book? It does seem your funds only stretch so far you can buy a Bible, Internet access, and a computer. Or did you have to borrow all of those, too? (I see you capitalised them all. If you actually meant specific people or objects by those names then I'm sorry, but I don't know (of) them personally so can't help.)
  14. How did something come from nothing?
    This is something that can be read about in a b-o-o-k. One on (quantum) physics. Not a Bible. Sorry.
So, there you have it Eric. A completely useless set of answers to a completely silly set of questions. You asked for it mate. Just don't go crying into your beer. But I guess you don't drink. A shame. Inebriation makes intense religious experiences easier to obtain. It does go hard on your liver, but what's a liver when enlightenment is in the offing. Or, for much better results, you could actually go to a decent school or university (or both, in that order) and get yourself up to speed with science. Real science. Repeat after me:


B-i-b-l-e   i-s   n-o-t   a   s-c-i-e-n-t-i-f-i-c   t-e-x-t. 
I-t   d-o-e-s   n-o-t   e-x-p-l-a-i-n   t-h-e   w-o-r-l-d.


Phew, that was a mouthful. Shame you won't listen. I can almost see you with fingers in your ears shouting la-la-la-la-la so you're not infected with that greatest of all evils - the truth and knowledge.

Sad. Truly sad...

PS
No need to thank me for giving you answers to more questions than Rosa did. Really. It was my pleasure.